This site is intended for UK healthcare professionals
Medscape UK Univadis Logo
Medscape UK Univadis Logo
Clinical Summary

Intermittent Oral Corticosteroids Prescription Tied to Adverse Outcomes in Asthma

Takeaway

  • A significant proportion of patients with asthma who received intermittent oral corticosteroids experienced a frequent prescribing pattern.
  • Increasing frequent patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroids prescription were associated with a higher risk of individual oral corticosteroids-related adverse outcomes, especially pneumonia and sleep apnoea.

Why This Matters

  • Findings suggest that the use of intermittent oral corticosteroids should be minimised in the asthma management whenever possible.

Study Design

  • This historical cohort study used data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD (2008-2019).
  • A total of 476,167 patients (age, ≥4 years) with asthma who received intermittent oral corticosteroids were matched (1:1) with 476,167 patients with or without asthma who did not receive oral corticosteroids.
  • Funding: AstraZeneca.

Key Results

  • Overall, 41.7%, 26.8% and 31.6% of patients had one-off, less frequent and frequent patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroids prescription, respectively.
  • Risk of any oral corticosteroids-related adverse outcomes increased with increasing frequent patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroids prescription (adjusted HR; 95% CI):
    • one-off oral corticosteroids (1.19; 1.18 to 1.20);
    • less frequent oral corticosteroids (1.35; 1.34 to 1.36); and
    • frequent oral corticosteroids (1.42; 1.42 to 1.43).
  • This association was consistent across age, Global Initiative for Asthma treatment step, inhaled corticosteroid maintenance and short-acting beta 2-agonists reliever use.
  • Risk of oral corticosteroids-related adverse outcomes, especially pneumonia and sleep apnoea, increased with increasing frequent patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroids prescription.

Limitations

  • Observation design.
  • Risk of residual confounding.

References


UP NEXT